Attorney General of Venezuela received his counterpart from the Criminal Court

World news


We have finished the meeting in the office of the Public Ministry, said the Venezuelan official on his Twitter account.

They also discussed the implementation of the memorandum of understanding signed between the State of the Bolivarian Republic and the ICC Prosecutor’s Office.

Khan arrived in this capital from Colombia, where he held a meeting with President Gustavo Petro.

On April 3, the Bolivarian Government categorically rejected the accusations made by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, in his response to the observations presented by Venezuela.

In a statement, the People’s Power Ministry for Foreign Relations described the indications of the ICC regarding the so-called “Venezuela I” matter as “unfounded”.

Once again, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court shows a clearly prejudiced vision in relation to Venezuela, reproducing without consideration the campaigns that seek to instrumentalize the issue of justice and human rights for political purposes, the note indicated.

The text pointed out that all of this is “detrimental to the seriousness and rigor” that is expected of such an important international instance.

He explained that the Bolivarian Republic presented on February 28, 2023 before the ICC, a solid document that distorts all the fallacies of the media and geopolitical aggression launched to accuse Venezuela of “alleged crimes against humanity”, which have never occurred. .

The Foreign Ministry stressed that the statements recently presented by the Prosecutor in no way distort the irrefutable statements made by Caracas.

On the contrary, he stated, they confirm that the ICC “lacks jurisdiction to hear the facts presented by Prosecutor Khan, in light of the provisions of the Rome Statute and the jurisprudence of that international body.”

Venezuela ratified that it will continue to exercise all available actions to make the truth prevail and defend its rights as a nation, in the face of this expression of “lawfare” that openly uses the institutional framework of the International Criminal Court for political purposes.

lam/jcd



source

Rate article
Add a comment